ItsTheBlog™

ITL: The blog itself is designed to serve as a means of entertainment to the public as well as to provide some insight into what we are all about here at ITL. ItsTheBlog stems from the website dedicated to all things sports, www.itstheleague.com. We love sports and we're always looking to make improvements and build on what we have, so feel free to leave us some feedback.

Sunday, June 24, 2007

 

How Do YOU Rate Duncan?


Tim Duncan just won his 4th NBA Championship in what has been a relatively boring career. The Big Fundamental just doesn't excite--but he gets the job done. With titles in 1999, 2003, 2005, and just 2 weeks ago in 2007, Duncan has to be included among the greats in NBA history--right?

Named MVP of the Finals during those first 3 championships, Duncan took a secondary role this time around to 2007 Finals' MVP Tony Parker. Keep in mind that he still averaged over 18 points, 11.5 boards and more than 3 blocks per game during the series. Parker may have been MVP, but there's no question who the Spurs' leader is.

So here's my question: where does Duncan rank in terms of the best players in NBA history? To be more specific, is Tim Duncan one of the top 10 players in the history of the league?

We know that the number of championships is certainly a factor in determining this ranking, which is why we can't include players like Karl Malone, John Stockton, Charles Barkley, and more in this list. But it definitely isn't the only factor, thus eliminating one of my personal favorites: Robert Horry and his 7 NBA championships.

So does Duncan make my top 10? Not quite. Could he? Sure, in time. Perhaps when we look back in NBA history, we may see Duncan and his 4 (+?) championships and call him one of the top 10 best players ever. But not yet. Part of the reason for this, unfortunately, is that he (and the teams he has played for) have been so boring to watch. Wonder why no one tuned into the Finals this season? The Spurs were playing...again! Even with Lebron there in the series, it just isn't all that exciting to watch Duncan and the Spurs pound away slowly. Fans typically prefer the run and gun style of the Phoenix Suns, Dallas Mavericks, etc., and the Spurs just don't cut it there.

It's a shame that this hurts my idea of Duncan and his successes, because he's had several. But I can name about a dozen players that I'd put ahead of Duncan on a list of the NBA's All-Time greats. West, Bird, Russell, Johnson, Jordan, Abdul-Jabbar, Chamberlain, O'neal, Robertson, Cousy, Mikan, and Bryant (yes--that Bryant), to name a few, would all be on my list (in no particular order) ahead of Timmy.

You've had many successes, Mr. Duncan. 2 MVP's, 3 Final's MVP's, 4 Championships, and you're one of the best players in NBA history. But you don't quite crack my top 10.

Labels: , , , , , ,


Comments:
I was reading this article and i thought of something. You stated that duncan averaged like 3 blocks or something near there in the finals. And when you hear people talk about players like greg oden they tout his 2.5 blocks a game as a huge thing. My question is, why are blocks talked about so much? Before recently they weren't even a stat. Whats so great about a block? If you get 3 blocks a game you save what 6 points? And who said that ball was going in anyway? Are blocks just cool to watch?
-Rojas
 
Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]





<< Home

Archives

June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   August 2008   December 2008   April 2010   September 2010   October 2010   November 2010   April 2011  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]